<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/2510975426650545788?origin\x3dhttp://amidveracityndeception.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
header
Friday, October 5, 2007 - 5:21 PM

saw this article and its a perfect example of how science only generates more questions instead solving them. ironic. i've always been for euthanasia. i believe people can choose whether they want to end their lives or not. i mean even without euthanasia millions of people have already found other ways to kill themselves. is it really against ethics then to have doctors help you end your life peacefully. hmm.

anyway that was not exactly the point. why women are categorized in "vulnerable groups" alongside elderly, the uninsured, the less educated, the poor, racial and ethnic minorities. just ridiculous.